GridRiskNet: A Two-Stage Hybrid Model for Project Investment Risk Management of Power Grid Enterprises Using Big Data Mining

Hongzhi Gao, Dekyi Dekyi, Metok Metok

Abstract


To enhance the power grid enterprise's ability to comprehensively perceive and dynamically assess investment risks in engineering projects, this study proposes a risk management model called GridRiskNet based on big data mining. This model integrates structured, unstructured, and spatiotemporal data and realizes intelligent identification of project risk probability distributions and potential impact ranges by constructing a two-stage hybrid modeling architecture. In the first stage, the model uses eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) to extract static and dynamic features in parallel. In the second stage, it introduces Graph Attention Recurrent Neural Network (GA-RNN) to model risk propagation paths under the power grid topology. Meanwhile, this study combines Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (ST-GCN) to improve the coupling expression of meteorological and text features. The experiment uses multi-source public data for verification, such as power infrastructure data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, meteorological observation data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and power grid topology data from OpenStreetMap. The results show that GridRiskNet performs excellently in risk prediction stability and regional propagation modeling. Among them, the risk principal component analysis projection score in 2023 reached 7.779. This indicates that cost overruns, climate pressure, and equipment technology risks together form a high-risk cluster, with cost overruns increasing by 269% compared with 2018. In the State-of-the-Art comparison, GridRiskNet achieves an F1-score of 0.892, a Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under Curve of 0.962, a Risk Impact Radius error of approximately 4.8 km, and a Risk Entropy of 0.89; these are comprehensively better than existing methods. Moreover, the model has good cross-modal feature fusion and risk transmission mechanism identification capabilities, and can effectively characterize the spatiotemporal coupling risk features in complex power grid projects. Overall, this system can provide power grid enterprises with structured and interpretable risk index outputs and regional early warning support. Thus, it helps to improve the investment safety and operational and maintenance resilience of projects.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Varbella A, Gjorgiev B, Sartore F, et al. Goal-oriented graph generation for transmission expansion planning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 149(4): 110350.

Silvester B R. Hesitation at increasing integration: The feasibility of Norway expanding cross-border renewable electricity interconnection to support European decarbonisation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, 213(3): 123917.

Yu Z, Guo L I, Wen T. Design management of clean energy projects from the perspective of partnering. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2025, 65(1): 115-124.

Nyangon J. Climate-proofing critical energy infrastructure: Smart grids, artificial intelligence, and machine learning for power system resilience against extreme weather events. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2024, 30(1): 03124001.

Sun B, Zhang Y, Fan B, et al. An optimal sequential investment decision model for generation-side energy storage projects in China considering policy uncertainty. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 83(11): 110748.

Sun P, Yuan C, Li X, et al. Big data analytics, firm risk and corporate policies: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 2024, 70(23): 102371.

Hammouri Q, Alfraheed M, Al-Wadi B M. Influence of information technology on project risk management: The mediating role of risk identification. Journal of Project Management, 2025, 10(1): 143-150.

Risanger S, Mays J. Congestion risk, transmission rights, and investment equilibria in electricity markets. The Energy Journal, 2024, 45(1): 173-200.

Khanna K, Govindarasu M. Resiliency-driven cyber–physical risk assessment and investment planning for power substations. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2024, 7(3): 21.

Liu H, Li X, Zhang Y. Investment risk assessment based on improved BP neural network. International Journal of Automation and Control, 2024, 18(6): 636-654.

Bussmann N, Giudici P, Tanda A, et al. Explainable machine learning to predict the cost of capital. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 8(1): 1578190.

Dong S B, Li A H. The application of deep learning models in investment risk analysis of intelligent manufacturing projects. Intelligent Decision Technologies-netherlands, 2025, 3(1): 14.

Loseva O V, Munerman I V, Fedotova M A. Assessment and classification models of regional investment projects implemented through concession agreements. Economy of Regions, 2024, 20(1): 276-292.

Mostofi F, Bahadır Ü, Tokdemir O B, et al. Enhancing strategic investment in construction engineering projects: A novel graph attention network decision-support model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2025, 203(2): 111033.

Qi Y. Multi modal graph search: intelligent massive-scale subgraph discovery for multi-category financial pattern mining. IEEE Access, 2025, 1(1): 331.

Luo S, Zhu X. Regional investment risk evaluation based on compound risk correlation coefficient and migration learning approach. Journal of Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, 2024, 24(1): 327-342.

Gao C, Wang X, Li D, et al. A novel hybrid power-grid investment optimization model with collaborative consideration of risk and benefit. Energies, 2023, 16(20): 7215.

Oikonomou K, Maloney P R, Bhattacharya S, et al. Energy storage planning for enhanced resilience of power systems against wildfires and heatwaves. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 119(1): 116074.

Tavakoli M, Chandra R, Tian F, et al. Multi-modal deep learning for credit rating prediction using text and numerical data streams. Applied Soft Computing, 2025. 2(4): 112771.

Liu K, Liu M, Tang M, et al. XGBoost-based power grid fault prediction with feature enhancement: application to meteorology. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 82(2): 7.

Zhou X, Li J. Risk assessment of high-voltage power grid under typhoon disaster based on model-driven and data-driven methods. Energies, 2025, 18(4): 809.

Zhang J, Zhang J, Liu H, et al. A two-stage adaptive affinity propagation clustering using the wtDTW distance: Application in portfolio optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 274(1): 126884.

Tikhomirova T, Tikhomirov N. M ethods for assessing low profitability risks of an investment project in conditions of uncertainty. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 2024, 24(2): 244-257.

Dai T S, Chen B J, Sun Y J, et al. Constructing optimal portfolio rebalancing strategies with a two-stage multiresolution-grid model. Computational Economics, 2024, 64(5): 3117-3142.

Feng J. Multi-attribute perceptual fuzzy information decision-making technology in investment risk assessment of green finance Projects. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2024, 33(1): 20230189.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i16.9643

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.