MOBAS-ALSTM: A Deep Learning and Metaheuristic Optimization Framework for Intelligent Carbon Footprint Accounting and Emission Strategy Optimization in Listed Companies

Jinhong Song, Meng Liu

Abstract


In response to increasing environmental accountability and regulatory pressures, publicly listed companies are actively seeking intelligent solutions to reduce carbon emissions (CE) while maintaining operational efficiency. The research proposes a deep learning (DL)-based framework for carbon footprint (CF) accounting and emission reduction strategy optimization, specifically designed for publicly traded companies. The Multi-Objective Beetle Antennae Search-driven Adaptive Long Short-Term Memory (MOBAS-ALSTM) method forecasts energy consumption and optimizes emission reduction strategies. By combining MOBAS optimization with adaptive LSTM forecasting, MOBAS-ALSTM balances the requirements of social sustainability, cost, emissions, and accuracy. CEs are calculated using data collected from IoT sensors, smart meters, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, supply chain logs, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reports, and energy usage records from listed companies, incorporating real-time operational, financial, and supply chain datasets. Data preprocessing includes data cleaning and Z-score normalization, while feature extraction employs the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to capture key frequency-time characteristics. The ALSTM component predicts future energy demands, while the MOBAS algorithm evaluates and allocates optimal emission reduction strategies, including improvements in energy efficiency, adoption of renewable energy, carbon tax modeling, and process reengineering. These strategies are evaluated based on expected emission reductions, economic costs, renewable energy contributions, and social impacts, including employment effects and public acceptance. The experimental validation of the MOBAS-ALSTM method outperformed the existing methods (CNN+RNN+RL, LSTM, and ANN,) in terms of prediction accuracy, with lower mean squared error (MSE) (0.00030), root mean squared error (RMSE) (0.0173), mean absolute error (MAE) (0.012), and a higher coefficient of determination (R²) (0.9985). The proposed DL based framework ensures transparency, scalability, and alignment with ESG reporting standards. The research establishes a robust, data-driven framework for listed companies to achieve Maximum CE and long-term carbon neutrality goals through intelligent carbon accounting and strategic emission control, thereby supporting regulatory compliance, stakeholder expectations, and sustainable growth.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Huang, L., Long, Y., Chen, J. and Yoshida, Y., 2023. Sustainable lifestyle: Urban household carbon footprint accounting and policy implications for lifestyle-based decarbonization. Energy Policy, 181, p.113696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113696

Augoye, O., Muyiwa-Ajayi, T.P. and Sobowale, A., 2024. The effectiveness of carbon accounting in reducing corporate carbon footprints. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(1), pp.1364-1371. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.1.1364-1371

Ahmetoğlu, S. and Tanık, A., 2020. Management of carbon footprint and determination of GHG emission sources in the construction sector. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7(2), pp.191-204. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.726913

Yu, F., Yuan, Q., Sheng, X., Liu, M., Chen, L., Yuan, X., Zhang, D., Dai, S., Hou, Z., Wang, Q. and Ma, Q., 2024. Understanding carbon footprint: An evaluation criterion for achieving sustainable development. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 22(4), pp.367-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2024.11.001

Wang, L. and Dai, S., 2024. Carbon Footprint Accounting and Verification of Seven Major Urban Agglomerations in China Based on Dynamic Emission Factor Model. Sustainability, 16(22), p.9817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229817

Ma, Y., Liu, X., Liu, J., Du, C., Liang, M., Li, W., Cao, L., Wang, D., Wang, H., Zhang, T. and Wei, B., 2024. Carbon Emission Accounting and Reduction Evaluation in Sponge City Residential Areas. Water, 16(17), p.2535. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172535

Duan, C., Wang, Z., Zhou, B. and Yao, X., 2024. Global polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic supply chain resource metabolism efficiency and carbon emissions co-reduction strategies. Sustainability, 16(10), p.3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103926

Wang, H., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Shang, N., Yao, S., Wen, F. and Zhao, J., 2024. Carbon footprint accounting driven by large language models and retrieval-augmented generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09713. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.09713

Zhai, Y., Li, Y., Tang, S., Liu, Y. and Liu, Y., 2024. Lightweight Strategies for Wooden-Structure Buildings Based on Embodied Carbon Emission Calculations for Carbon Reduction. Buildings, 14(11), p.3460.https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113460

Li, Z., Li, X., Lu, C., Ma, K. and Bao, W., 2024. Carbon emission responsibility accounting in renewable energy-integrated DC traction power systems. Applied Energy, 355, p.122191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122191

Hertwich, E.G., 2021. Increased carbon footprint of materials production driven by rise in investments. Nature Geoscience, 14(3), pp.151-155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00690-8

Chen, X., Ma, C., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., Huang, X., Wang, M., Cai, Y., Su, D., Muneer, M.A., Guo, M. and Chen, X., 2021. Identifying the main crops and key factors determining the carbon footprint of crop production in China, 2001–2018. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 172, p.105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105661

Walenta, J., 2021. The making of the corporate carbon footprint: the politics behind emission scoping. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14(5), pp.533-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1935297

Banerjee, S., Khan, M.A. and Ul Husnain, M.I., 2021. Searching appropriate system boundary for accounting India's emission inventory for the responsibility to reduce carbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, p.112907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00587-w

Liu, Z., Sun, T., Yu, Y., Ke, P., Deng, Z., Lu, C., Huo, D. and Ding, X., 2022. Near-real-time carbon emission accounting technology toward carbon neutrality. Engineering, 14, pp.44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.019

Yuan, X., Sheng, X., Chen, L., Tang, Y., Li, Y., Jia, Y., Qu, D., Wang, Q., Ma, Q. and Zuo, J., 2022. Carbon footprint and embodied carbon transfer at the provincial level of the Yellow River Basin. Science of the total environment, 803, p.149993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149993

Huang, W., Wu, F., Han, W., Li, Q., Han, Y., Wang, G., Feng, L., Li, X., Yang, B., Lei, Y. and Fan, Z., 2022. Carbon footprint of cotton production in China: Composition, spatiotemporal changes and driving factors. Science of the Total Environment, 821, p.153407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153407

Farago, M., Damgaard, A., Rebsdorf, M., Nielsen, P.H. and Rygaard, M., 2022. Challenges in carbon footprint evaluations of state-of-the-art municipal wastewater resource recovery facilities. Journal of Environmental Management, 320, p.115715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115715

Valls-Val, K. and Bovea, M.D., 2022. Carbon footprint assessment tool for universities: CO2UNV. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, pp.791-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.020

García-Alaminos, Á., Gilles, E., Monsalve, F. and Zafrilla, J., 2022. Measuring a university's environmental performance: A standardized proposal for carbon footprint assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, p.131783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131783

Alghieth, M., 2025. Sustain AI: A Multi-Modal Deep Learning Framework for Carbon Footprint Reduction in Industrial Manufacturing. Sustainability, 17(9), p.4134.https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094134

Ezenkwu, C.P., Cannon, S. and Ibeke, E., 2024. Monitoring carbon emissions using deep learning and statistical process control: a strategy for impact assessment of governments’ carbon reduction policies. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 196(3), p.231.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12388-6




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i23.11198

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.